top of page
Want to have the latest History Notes delivered right to your inbox weekly? Head over to Sign Up for Our Newsletter to get History Notes sent to your email every Thursday morning! 

In the early days of the Commonwealth, children of parents who, for one reason or another, were unable to care for them became public charges. Archives of the Longmeadow Historical Society include indentures for twenty-five children who were wards of Longmeadow and under the care of the Selectmen and Overseers of the Poor. One such family was the Simonds. The indenture contracts in some ways tells just the beginning of the story for these children. What becomes of them after the terms of their service ends is a much harder story to uncover. Curious about what became of them after they were indentured, we traced some of their stories.


Ebenezer and Caroline Simonds settled in Longmeadow and started raising a family. The 1790 U.S. Census shows that the household included one son (John, who died shortly after the census was taken) and three daughters: Clarissa; Cleora; and Asenath. Four more children followed: Luke; Loammi, born in 1794; Sophia, born in 1796; and Anne, born in 1798.


Ebenezer, a blacksmith, struggled to support his growing family and family finances fell further into distress when Ebenezer died on November 4, 1799. The widowed Caroline found it impossible to financially support seven children and she turned to the town for assistance. Town records do not show payments to support Caroline or her oldest four children, so perhaps she was able to care for them using other resources and they were not considered town paupers. But we know that the three youngest Simonds (or Simons or Symonds or Symons) children became town paupers and that at least two of them were indentured outto citizens of Longmeadow so that they would be fed, housed, and raised to be productive citizens of the community. Here is what we know about these children.


Loammi Simonds

On December 21, 1801, Longmeadow Selectmen indentured eight-year old Loammi to Moses Field until he turned 21 years of age in 1815. Loammi was to learn husbandry (or farming) from this established farmer.


Standard indenture clauses required Loammi to: serve his master “well and faithfull”; keep his “lawful commands everywhere at all times readily”; “do no damage to his said master”; “not wast[e] the goods of his said master nor lend them to any unlawfully at card dice or any other unlawfull game he shall not play”;“nor no matrimony contract during said term”; and “taverns ale houses & plases of gaming he shall not haunt or frequent”. While these terms may seem harsh to our ears, New England children in a family unit were generally expected to follow such rules. Loammi was not a party to the contract (as a town pauper, Longmeadow Selectmen signed as his surrogate parents), but he was required to abide by these terms until the age of twenty-one.


For his part, Moses Field promised to teach him to read, write, and cipher, feed and clothe him, and “at the expiration thereof shall give unto him the said apprentice sixty-six dollars and sixty-seven cents lawfull money of said Commonwealth...”



Loammi and Sarah had three children: Clarinda; Simeon; and John. Loammi was a successful farmer, having apparently paid attention to his lessons from Moses Field. He was also a respected member of the community and was appointed to leadership positions at First Church. In early 1868, Loammi died of pneumonia and he was buried in Longmeadow. For Loammi Simons, his indenture period worked exactly as it was designed – he was given a stable upbringing and was taught a useful trade that he was able to practice productively throughout the rest of his life.


Sophia Symons

Selectman's records show that town residents took care of Sophia during 1802 and 1803 and, since she was a town pauper, they were compensated for doing so. We know that she spent periods of time in the homes of Zadock Stebbins, Israel Colton, and Deacon William Colton and that Gaius Bliss made her a pair of shoes.



When she was seven years old, on December 2, 1803, “Sophia Symonds Daughter of Ebenezer Simonds …whose child is left without support” was indentured to Er Taylor of Longmeadow “to learn the art trade and mystery housewifery after the manner of an apprentice”. The indenture period was to last until Sophia turned age 18. Er Taylor was paid $10.50 to assume this responsibility.




The terms of her indenture were similar to that of her brother, Loammi, but, like most girls, Sophia was not required to learn cyphering (i.e., arithmetic). Also typical for female children, Sophia was not to receive money at the end of her indenture period. These gender-based differences in indenture clauses correlated to the different tasks that were expected of men and women. Cyphering was needed to run a business, which was not an field which women were encouraged to enter. And, women were expected to marry; their husbands would provide for them and they would not need an independent source of funds.


Sophia grew up in the Taylor household in the eastern half of Longmeadow. In 1823, Sophia Simons married Lyman Silcock (or Silcox or Silcocks) of Longmeadow, a stone cutter and farmer. They had two daughters and one son. The 1831 map shows the Silcox family living near the current Longmeadow-East Longmeadow border. By 1855, the family had moved across the street from Ethan Taylor, just north of the East Longmeadow rotary. Ethan was the son of Er Taylor; just six years older than Sophia, they had grown up in the same household and were likely close. As neighbors, it was easy to maintain their friendship.


Unfortunately, the Silcox family was struck with a series of losses. Consumption took daughter Maria Sophia in 1858, and then husband Lyman in 1861. Son Edwin F. Silcox, a surgeon who had served in the 18th Massachusetts Infantry during the Civil War, returned home to practice medicine in Springfield. But, he died shortly afterwards, on Aug. 28, 1864, of typhoid fever. Sophia and her remaining child, Harriet, lived together until Sophia’s death in 1878.


Aware of the challenges that Sophia and Harriet were facing, Ethan assisted his friend. In his will, Ethan Taylor left “One Hundred Dollars to Sophia Silcox, widow of Lyman Silcox late of said Longmeadow...”


While the Taylor family's relationship with Sophia was harmonious, this doesn't appear to be the case for another indentured child of Er Taylor who lived in the household contemporaneously with Sophia and Ethan – William Brumphrey. On April 27, 1815, Er Taylor posted this advertisement in the Hampden Federalist, “Ran away from the subscriber, on the 26th inst. William Brumphrey, an indentured boy, about 15 years of age. All person are forbid harbouring or trusting said boy on my account, as I am determined not to pay any debts of his contracting after this date.”


Anne Simons

The youngest Simons child, Anne, was born in December 1798, less than a year before her father died. Around 1804, she was taken in by Lt. Hezekiah Hale of Longmeadow and, on December 18, 1804 Lt. Hale received $15 “to pay him for keeping Anne Simon one of the towns poor since she has been with him also for taking her in future…”. Most likely, Anne came under his care through an article of indenture, like her siblings, but we do not have a copy of this indenture. So, it is possible that Anne was merely "vondued", or auctioned, on a long-term basis to Lt. Hale and that she was never indentured. A vondue placement would not have obligated Lt. Hale to teach Anne to read, write, or learn how to be a housewife, skills that she would need to make her way in the world as an adult.



Why would Hezekiah Hale take on the responsibility of a young child? Possibly both for companionship and because he needed another pair of hands around the house. Lt. Hale had married Miriam Bliss only a few years earlier (in 1799) when Hezekiah was 59 and Miriam was 31. This older couple had no children and it makes sense that Miriam would have wanted a girl to help her with the many chores needed to run a household. In the 1810 U.S. Census, a white girl between the ages of 11 and 16 lived in Lt. Hale’s household, and this girl is probably Anne.


Lt. Hezekiah Hale died in 1813 when Anne was 15 years old. If Anne was indentured to Lt. Hale, his widow, Miriam Bliss Hale, would have inherited his contractual responsibility for Anne and Anne would have remained in Miriam’s household after Hezekiah’s death. Miriam Bliss Hale did not remain a widow for long. She re-married on April 3, 1816 – to Gad Colton of Longmeadow – and an indentured Anne would have moved to Gad's household.


When she was 16, Anne became pregnant. The last definitive documentation that we have for Anne leaves more questions than answers. An entry in the Longmeadow death records states: “April 15, 1816, Symonds (A Child) dead, mother Anna Symonds.” No further information, such as the name of the father, was given. It is easy to imagine the gossip in the close-knit Longmeadow community when an unwed, under-age young woman gave birth only twelve days after the widow (who was likely responsible for her) married.


Anne would have needed both physical and emotional support after suffering this pregnancy loss, but we do not know where she was living or who was available to help her. She was not yet 18 years old (the standard year for girls to end their indentures), so, if she was indentured, she would have been living with newlyweds Gad and Miriam Colton. She does not appear in the selectman’s records as a pauper, so it is unlikely that she was boarded at another home at the town’s expense.


She may have been living with another member of the Simons family. Her mother, Caroline, and brother, Luke, were also living in Longmeadow and we know that the family stayed in touch and supported each other over the years. Census data reveals that Loammi and Sarah Simons took in his widowed sisters; Clarissa (widow of Daniel Hawley) was in their household in 1855 and Sophia and Harriet Silcox were in their household in 1865.


It is unlikely that we will ever know what became of Anne.


-Contributed by Beth Hoff, Longmeadow Historical Society Board Member.


Sources:

Longmeadow Historical Society Archives

Special thanks to Dennis Picard

Massachusetts, U.S. Wills and Probate Records 1635-1991

Marriage-ChurchRecords-1716-1844

Massachusetts, U.S., Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988

Massachusetts, U.S., Death Records, 1841-1915

U.S., Civil War Soldier Records and Profiles, 1864-1865

Hampden Federalist, May 4, 1815

Massachusetts Census, 1855 and 1865

U.S. Census




 
 
 

Barney & Berry Ice Skates

Longmeadow Historical Society Collection


Next week, local historian and friend of the Longmeadow Historical Society, Dennis Picard will join us at the Richard Salter Storrs Library to present “Winter Pleasures and Pastimes.” Without a doubt, the winter of 2023 has been mild. That doesn’t mean we can’t still sit back and reflect on the usual delights of the season.


In an essay titled "Winter" for the Center School literary journal, The Carrier Pigeon, one student reflected on her mixed feelings in the winter season of 1864. She wrote, “Some parts of winter are very pleasant. The first part of this winter, there was very good skating, and then there came sleighing and it lasted a long time, and there has not been much skating since. It has been warm weather for a time until a few days since. It commenced to snow on Monday morning about 11 o’clock and snowed all day, until about 5 o’clock cleared off very cold and I think that it was not very pleasant doing chores last night, nor this morning. I know that I did not think it was. I should like to have skating or good sleighing now instead of this weather, for it is very cold, and there is neither skating or sliding or sleighing.*” Who among us hasn’t marveled at the quiet beauty of snow-covered trees after a storm, only to complain about the shoveling and cold?


"Winter" by Center School student, 1864

Collection of Longmeadow Historical Society


No doubt she would have loved to take a turn on the ice in this c.1860’s wool, royal blue colored five-piece skating ensemble from our collection. The dress looks like it has come to life straight out of a Curriers & Ives print called The Skating Carnival from 1862.

Skating Outfit c. 1860's

Collection of Longmeadow Historical Society

Close-up detail of c. 1860's Skating Outfit

Collection of the Longmeadow Historical Society


As for the skates, if you look closely at the markings on the steel blade you will notice they were manufactured by Barney & Berry out of nearby Springfield, MA, founded by Everett Barney whose Carriage House is still a Forest Park treasure.


Springfield maker "Barney & Berry"


While there is still some snow on the ground, sit back and enjoy these items from our collection that reflect winters from the past. Then come join us on March 8th at 6:30 pm at the Storrs Library to learn more from Dennis Picard. Per the program description: “Often when early New England winters are brought to mind, we imagine families huddled around an insufficient fire in a dark and cold house while snow pelts the windows and the wolves howl at their door. Well, our ancestors made time for fun in the colder months. Sometimes it was something done as part of a chore but often it was something just for pleasure. Come hear why winter was welcomed by many and anxiously awaited by some.” Pre-registration encouraged. Register here http://bit.ly/3kGt571


This event is co-sponsored by the Longmeadow Historical Society, Richard Salter Storrs Library, and Peoples Bank.




-Contributed by Melissa M. Cybulski with credit to Betsy McKee for dress and skate photos


* Letter transcription edited for clarity












 
 
 

1920 Map of Longmeadow showing the area of the Brookline development


“…lot shall not be re-sold to a colored person, an Italian or a Polander” – the Brookline Plan

The first two decades of the twentieth century saw rapid changes in technology and demographics and the greater Springfield area, including Longmeadow, was no exception. The development and growth of the street railway enabled many people the ability to live further away from where they worked in urban centers like Springfield. Additionally, immigrants from faraway places such as Eastern and Southern Europe were streaming into this area seeking greater economic opportunities and political freedom. Simultaneously, African Americans were migrating in large numbers to the Northeast for the exact same reasons. These forces shaped the creation of a new Longmeadow development known as Brookline.



"Sylvester Bliss place", Sept. 24, 1885. Drawing by Martha Goldthwait.

Longmeadow Historical Society collection


The land that would become the Brookline development, situated east of Longmeadow Street and north of Bliss Road, used to be the farm of Sylvester Bliss. In the early 1900s, land along Longmeadow Street which contained the trolley track to Springfield was highly prized by real estate developers. Hattie M. Bliss, daughter of Sylvester Bliss and the heir to his farmland, decided to sell the Bliss farm for development. In January of 1913, she sold the land to Edwin H. Robbins, a Springfield real estate developer. Hattie Bliss’s deed to Edwin H. Robbins included typical restrictions such as building setbacks from the property line; it also specified that one street would be named “Dayton” and another would be named “Rosemore”.


Edwin H. Robbins, who lived in Springfield, was a busy man who developed six different large tracts of land in Springfield into residential housing. Four of these developments were near his home on Wilbraham Road; the other two were in more distant sections of Springfield. Deeds for lots sold in the four nearby developments had a restriction that specified that “said lot shall not be resold to a colored person, a Polander or an Italian.” This restrictive covenant, which expired in either 1930 or 1935 depending on the development, was not on the deeds in the two developments far from his home.

In February 1913, Mr. Robbins filed the Brookline Plan at the Hampden Registry of Deeds and he started selling off the lots. His promotional materials promised an up-scale neighborhood; in one of his advertisements, he promised “I have restricted it so highly that I GUARANTEE YOU DESIRABLE NEIGHBORS…”


Advertisement for Brookline.

Springfield Republican, May 4, 1913


Some of the Brookline lots were sold to individuals, but most of them were sold in batches to other developers such as Riley-Alderman Realty Trust, A.T. Spooner Company, and Rood-Davidson Realty Trust. On eighty-eight of the lots (highlighted on the plan), Edwin H. Robbins added the resale restriction that he had used in Springfield: “said lot shall not be resold to a colored person, an Italian or a Polander.” All restrictions on the Brookline deeds were set to expire on January 1, 1935.



Brookline Plan, Hampden County Registry of Deeds.

Deeds for the highlighted lots had resale restrictions.


Deed for sale of Lot 6 located at Book 894 Page 482.

From Hampden County Registry of Deeds



Why would Mr. Robbins exclude these particular groups of people from ownership? We have no documentation of his intentions, but we can speculate. In many 1913 minds, an exclusive community that would be “the highest class development in Longmeadow” would not likely include African Americans or certain groups of recent European immigrants. Racial motivations likely mixed with nativist ones in also excluding locally surging immigrant populations from Southern and Eastern Europe.


It is relatively simple to define "an Italian" for the purposes of these deeds. But, who was a “Polander”? According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a Polander is “a native or inhabitant of Poland.” In 1913, Poland was not a political entity; the geography that currently constitutes modern Poland had for centuries been partitioned between the Russian, Austria-Hungary, and German Empires. Most, if not all, of the Russian-controlled portion of Poland was in “The Pale”, the only portion of the Russian Empire where Jews were allowed to live. Both Catholic and Jewish immigrants from Polish areas of Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Germany were likely known as “Polanders”.


There were forty-five lots sold to Rood-Davidson Realty Trust (comprised of Dexter Rood and Arthur W. Davidson) that were not subject to this deed restriction and they are not highlighted on the plan. Again, we do not know exactly why Mr. Rood and Mr. Davidson's lots did not bear this provision. Perhaps they simply did not want to limit their pool of potential resale buyers. But there is also evidence that Davidson, at least, was open to religious diversity. Arthur Davidson was an immigrant from the Canadian province of Quebec which had a Catholic majority. Mrs. Davidson’s actions in 1916 when she hosted a meeting of the Longmeadow Maternal Association further support this position. The speaker at this meeting promoted the interdenominational connectivity of Christian denominations and Judaism on the basis of the Bible and the commandments. This message could be taken as an argument against those advocating for the idea of a White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant elitist community.


Although Edwin Robbins was seemingly opposed to living with and building homes for those of different ethnic and religious backgrounds, he was willing to do business with them to further his financial interests. Bernhard Radding, a Jewish immigrant from Russia (and perhaps a Polander), was a real estate developer and general contractor. Mr. Radding was involved in the development of thirty-six of the lots in Brookline, most of which had deed restrictions that would have prevented a Polander from homeownership. His brother Julius (also perhaps a Polander) was living at 36 Belleclaire Avenue in 1920. If the intent of these restrictions was to keep out Eastern European immigrants, it seems they failed to do so.


Belleclaire Avenue 1918. Emerson Collection of the Longmeadow Historical Society


Edwin Robbins was also willing to hire these recent immigrants to work at the Brookline development. In July 1913, during a heat wave in which the thermometers in the area reached 99 or 100 degrees, an Italian laborer grading streets in Brookline was one of many in western Massachusetts who succumbed to the heat. An earlier article in the Springfield Union reported that the man had died, but the authors have found no corroborating evidence that he did so.


Springfield Republican, July 4, 1913


Bliss Road, unpaved, 1913. Emerson Collection of the Longmeadow Historical Society


All of the Brookline deed restrictions expired on January 1, 1935. While today these restrictions would be illegal, at the time they were not. In 1946, Massachusetts passed the Massachusetts Fair Housing Law which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, national origin, ancestry, or religious creed. In 1968, Congress passed the Fair Housing Act (FHA) which enshrined equal housing opportunity at the federal level and provided federal enforcement mechanisms to combat housing discrimination.


Even so, housing discrimination still exists today. If you are living in Massachusetts and feel you have been a victim of discrimination, you can contact MCAD either by phone at (413) 739-2145 or by email at mcad@ma.gov and if you are living anywhere in the USA and you feel you have been the victim of housing discrimination, please contact the Department of Housing and Urban Development either by phone at (800) CALL-FHA (800-225-5342) or by email at answers@hud.gov.






-Contributed by Tim Casey and Beth Hoff, Longmeadow Historical Society Board Members


Sources:

Hampden County Registry of Deeds

1920 Map of Longmeadow

Archives of the Longmeadow Historical Society

Springfield Republican, May 4, 1913; July 4, 1913, March 8, 1916

Statistics for Massachusetts


Special thanks to Chris Holmgren





 
 
 

Contact

Contact us to learn more about our collections, upcoming events, and visiting the Storrs House Museum.

Address

697 Longmeadow Street Longmeadow, MA 01106

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • X

413-567-3600

© 2026 by Longmeadow Historical Society. 

Address: 697 Longmeadow Street 

Longmeadow, MA 01106

Email: info@longmeadowhistoricalsociety.org 

Phone: (413) 567-3600 

The contents of this website are the property of the Longmeadow Historical Society and may only be used or reproduced for non-commercial purposes unless licensing is obtained from the society.

The Longmeadow Historical Society is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization

bottom of page